• Metadoro
  • Productos
  • Noticias y análisis

Noticias y análisis

Consulte las perspectivas de mercado compartidas por los miembros de nuestra comunidad
21.04.2022
Tres acciones que están atrayendo la atención de los alcistas: Procter & Gamble

El informe financiero del famoso fabricante mundial de productos del segmento de consumo del primer trimestre de 2022 mostró todos los signos de un crecimiento estable de los ingresos, que alcanzaron los 19,38 mil millones de dólares, un 3,5% más de lo que esperaban los analistas de Wall Street, y también un 7% más del período correspondiente en 2021. Pero en comparación con la temporada prenavideña de fin de año, las cifras son, por supuesto, menores. Contrariamente a las afirmaciones de que las presiones de los precios de compra están perjudicando las ganancias de los productores, las ganancias por acción (EPS) aumentaron 7 centavos durante año a 1,33 dólares. Los suministros de productos médicos como Oral-B y Pepto-Bismol aumentaron un 13%.

Procter & Gamble elevó su pronóstico de ventas anual y confirmó que la demanda de productos de higiene y cuidado de la salud sigue siendo estable a pesar del aumento de los precios. "Orgánicamente, el crecimiento de los ingresos será del 6% al 7%", dijo la compañía, que está por encima del pronóstico de consenso de los analistas del 5,5%. Las acciones de Procter & Gamble subieron un 3% inmediatamente después de los datos trimestrales, deteniéndose en 88 centavos por debajo de su máximo de enero. Está claro que el precio no se mantendrá en los niveles actuales después de subir un 17,5% desde enero de 2021. Andre Schulten, vicepresidente de asuntos financieros de la compañía, dijo que espera una disminución de BPA de 1 centavo en el tercer trimestre debido al conflicto militar en Ucrania. En el cuarto trimestre, esta cifra puede disminuir en otros 4 centavos. El comentario sigue a la decisión de la compañía de dejar de invertir en Rusia y "reducir sustancialmente" su línea de productos, centrándose en productos de higiene, productos médicos y de cuidado personal. Rusia y Ucrania representan alrededor del 1,5% de todas las ventas de la empresa.

El negocio basado en la producción de productos de consumo diario suele ser más resistente durante una tormenta inflacionaria. Produce productos simples y necesarios que las personas han estado usando durante años y están acostumbrados a ellos. Es poco probable que las amas de casa renuncien a Pampers, Tampax o Always, y es poco probable que sus esposos que usan maquinillas para afeitar Gillette, estén listos para cambiar a otras marcas, especialmente cuando sus precios también están aumentando.

26.01.2023
Top 5 perdedores de 2022: Consumo discrecional

En 2022, todo el sector de consumo discrecional, que incluye empresas que producen bienes no esenciales: automóviles, ropa, artículos de lujo, hoteles, restaurantes, etc., fue muy afectado. Cuando llegan tiempos difíciles, la gente sigue comprando comida, pero comienza a ahorrar en otras áreas. Los temores sobre la inflación y la recesión inminente provocaron el colapso del ETF XLY en casi 40% a finales de año. Sin embargo, tales reducciones a menudo brindan excelentes oportunidades de inversión, ya que es raro ver acciones de compañías icónicas como Nike, Toyota y Home Depot tan lejos de sus valores máximos. Los informes macroeconómicos recientes apuntan a que quizás los temores de una disminución en la demanda de los consumidores son demasiado pesimistas. Las ventas minoristas en EE.UU. durante la temporada navideña fueron bastante fuertes (según Mastercard, el gasto en los Estados Unidos aumentó 7.6% interanual entre el 1 de noviembre y el 24 de diciembre), y los empleadores siguen buscando nuevo personal. Tal dinámica favorece el aumento de los salarios y la preservación de la actividad de consumo.

28.03.2023
Axie Infinity: el pionero de play-2-earn ha perdido relevancia

En 2021, el juego Axie Infinity basado en blockchain se convirtió en un verdadero descubrimiento: la cantidad de personas que querían ganar dinero criando animales y participando en batallas se disparó, gracias a lo cual el valor del token se disparó en más del 1000% en noviembre. Desde entonces, muchos proyectos han intentado repetir el éxito de Axie, pero todos han tenido el mismo final triste.

El problema de proyectos de este tipo es fundamental. Cuando un token de juego comienza a cotizar en una bolsa, su precio se vuelve extremadamente vulnerable a la afluencia de usuarios. Tan pronto como disminuye, se vuelve imposible mantener la presión de los vendedores, como resultado de lo cual las cotizaciones caigan como una piedra. Cabe recordar que con el aumento del valor de las monedas, aumenta el umbral de entrada. No todos pueden pasar mucho tiempo en un juego muy monótono, especialmente cuando la recompensa financiera se vuelve mínima. Axie también sufre de este malestar. Diversas estrategias de marketing, como mayores recompensas para los jugadores activos, no son capaces de cambiar fundamentalmente la situación. Si a finales de 2021 el número de compradores únicos de AXS era alrededor de 500 mil, en los últimos meses su número no ha superado los 20 mil. En este sentido, a los inversores se recomienda buscar nuevos proyectos que puedan dispararse durante el próximo ciclo alcista. Son los primeros usuarios los que tienen la oportunidad de ganar mucho dinero, incluso vendiendo sus tokens a especuladores lentos que realizan compras después de que sube el precio.

19.01.2023
Top 5 líderes de crecimiento en 2022: la soja

En el verano de 2022, los futuros de soja alcanzaron su punto máximo, con un aumento de precio del 35% desde principios de año. Al analizar este instrumento, se debe tener en cuenta que la soja se usa en dos direcciones a la vez: no solo es una parte importante de la industria alimentaria (incluso se usa para alimentar el ganado), sino que también se utiliza para producir biodiesel para automóviles. En ese sentido, es muy similar al maíz, cuyos futuros también están en el mercado. Los principales impulsores de los aumentos de precios son la alta inflación, que eleva el costo de producción, la falta de fertilizantes y la incertidumbre relacionada con el clima en las regiones clave donde se cultiva la soja. En 2022, se cosecharon 163 millones de toneladas de soja en América Latina (principalmente en Brasil y Argentina), más que en los Estados Unidos, China e India. Varios brokers agrícolas esperan un nuevo aumento en la inflación de los alimentos. Se necesitan cosechas récord para satisfacer la demanda actual, mientras que un mal clima y los altos precios de la energía limitan significativamente la oferta.

16.03.2023
¿Qué hará el S&P 500 después de caer a los 3400 puntos?

Los futuros sobre el índice de mercado amplio S&P 500 están resbalando cada vez más, mostrando que el intento de romper el límite superior del canal descendente a principios de febrero, aparentemente, no tuvo éxito. Y si es así, entonces es hora de considerar un plan aproximado para la caída del principal índice de referencia bursátil. En la mayoría de los casos, luego de que un instrumento financiero no logra romper un nivel importante, recibe un fuerte contraataque debido a la debilidad mostrada. Creo que en el caso de los futuros del S&P 500, esto significa un retorno lógico a la mitad del actual canal bajista en la zona de los 3400 puntos. Donde, como podemos ver, se ubica el primer nivel técnico muy fuerte. Tal caída en el índice de referencia bursátil estadounidense se correlaciona bien con la situación actual, cuando los mercados están temblando debido a la crisis bancaria en EE. UU. y Europa. Personalmente, prácticamente no tengo dudas sobre una caída a este nivel. Pero luego, las opciones demasiado polares y extremas sugieren una bifurcación en 3400 puntos.

Es posible que la situación se aclare durante la caída del mercado, pero hasta ahora lo máximo con lo que se puede contar vendiendo futuros del índice S&P 500, es su caída en el próximo mes y medio entre 12 y 14%.

Rafael Quintana Martinez
Money Manager de alto rendimiento, con una sólida formación académica, profesional y de campo. Más de 9 años de experiencia especializada en el comercio de mercados financieros internacionales. La devoción, la fiabilidad, la responsabilidad y la ética impulsan mi vida. Actualmente me desempeño como Analista Senior para Metadoro. https://metadoro.com/es https://mx.investing.com/members/contributors/235587671/ https://es.tradingview.com/chart/EURUSD/rE9gVips/
Bitcoin Is Losing Momentum

Bitcoin (BTC) is up 0.5% this week to $105,122, recovering from a sharp 6.4% drop to $97,696 on Monday. The decline was triggered by Donald Trump’s tariff threat against Colombia. Though, BTC pulled through it surviving during panic over China’s DeepSeek R1 chatbot and a hawkish Federal Reserve (Fed) meeting on Wednesday.

However, there were positive developments as well. Fed Chair Jerome Powell acknowledged that banks can serve clients holding crypto assets, provided risks are properly managed. He also stressed the need for clear crypto regulations. Trump continued pressuring the Fed, criticising its indecision facilitating bullish trends for crypto markets. On this news, Bitcoin gained 3.0%.

Despite this rebound, Bitcoin remains at a crossroads. A potential correction to $80,000–90,000 could take place before the next major rally in April–May. Alternatively, BTC may continue its uptrend without a significant pullback. February will be key in determining the path.

3628
Rafael Quintana Martinez
Money Manager de alto rendimiento, con una sólida formación académica, profesional y de campo. Más de 9 años de experiencia especializada en el comercio de mercados financieros internacionales. La devoción, la fiabilidad, la responsabilidad y la ética impulsan mi vida. Actualmente me desempeño como Analista Senior para Metadoro. https://metadoro.com/es https://mx.investing.com/members/contributors/235587671/ https://es.tradingview.com/chart/EURUSD/rE9gVips/
Cardano Is Falling Despite Network Development

Cardano (ADA) is down 5.0% this week to $0.9303, underperforming the broader crypto market, where Bitcoin (BTC) fell 1.9% to $102,534. The entire market faced sell-off pressure after U.S. President Donald Trump threatened Colombia with tariffs over its initial refusal to accept deported citizens. The decline was further fueled by concerns over China’s DeepSeek R1 chatbot, which rattled the generative AI industry.

While stocks of AI developers are now recovering, and the crypto market is showing signs of a rebound, Cardano remains weak after falling below the key $1.0000 support level. Despite ongoing network development, including the Plomin hard fork scheduled for Wednesday, these factors are unlikely to reverse ADA’s downtrend in the short term.

If broader market sentiment doesn’t improve, Cardano could continue declining toward the $0.8000 support level.

3955
B
Make NVidia Rise Again?

Ironically, I was exactly that unlucky and four-eye chowder head who just wrote a cream puff piece of paper praising incredible growth of NVidia stock right before the weekend, which was followed by an epic price plunge on Monday. Well, let me laugh at myself for a while to make it better and then draw first conclusions from what is happening. And here I am going to get the assistance of common sense. The AI darling NVidia tumbled about 17% in the blink of an eye to shed some $590 billion in market cap, most in Wall Street history. This record loss has been quickly replicated by other AI businesses from NVidia's close circle like Broadcom (AVGO), Oracle (ORCL), Micron Technologies (MU), as well as the Japanese SoftBank Group (TSE), which is one more major investor into Stargate project to build advanced data centres in the U.S. All that craziness took place because a Chinese guy with his friends had eaten a bat or a diseased pangolin. Oh no, by the saints, I must have got it wrong. This is not a legend telling about the origin of coronavirus. Today we have a story of how a small group of smart Chinese guys who spent $6 million for their successful start-up DeepSeek to cast doubt over all heavy trillions of investments in the global AI infrastructure and investigations that have been done before those great thinkers. It was widely reported that DeepSeek represented the best-performing open-source model, also exhibiting competitive effects against frontier closed-source models including ChatGPT, OpenAI and other generative pre-trained transformers (GPTs) by Google, Meta, Microsoft etc. I have no doubt that DeepSeek guys are all givers and great people. But forgive me if I question the rest of the stuff. Let's start with the fact that the experimentalists from DeepSeek used only NVidia chips when doing their work, and not components of their own production or from some other chip manufacturer. Training the model allegedly required 2,048 NVidia H800 GPUs, costing around $50 million. Comparable OpenAI chatbot models may cost hundreds of millions of dollars to build and test. H800 is a legal export version that NVidia made by slowing down its faster H100 chip after strict U.S. regulations were put in place to stop selling their coolest technology to China. And the H100 is not the latest advance already as there is Blackwell chip to offer up to 4x faster training and 30x faster inference than its predecessor H100.

If so, then it turns out that several dozens of Chinese eggheads repeated Western records, when using chips with lower performance and spending a hundred times less money to generate an AI-based feature. From this mass media concluded that now a lower total quantity and poorer quality of chips will be needed in principle for advanced AI tasks, so that revenues of NVidia and other AI-related firms will not be as huge as everyone in the market thought. It may be a small thing, but the DeepSeek startup is reportedly co-financed by the Chinese hedge fund High-Flyer, which has access to 50,000 of NVidia's original H100 GPUs. It's hard to tell if these H100 GPUs were involved in the work or not, and any version can be broadcasted later. They can't disclose the real truth about skipping U.S. export controls on AI chips, as another possible idea. There are also rumours of hidden funding from the Chinese government. But let's not speculate on this. Our idea would be they may use older slow chips, and much fewer chips by NVidia. This means there will soon be a lot of little tricksters who just want to repeat DeepSeek achievements somewhere in their home garage, trying to solve a similar kind of programming task literally on the knee. Just in a way like every college student was trying to become a Bitcoin miner not a long time ago. Here you have a sharp increase in demand for chips, let's say, of the previous generation from NVidia, meaning a demand by smaller customers. Which may even be good for NVidia, while the largest corporations like Microsoft and Meta are only interested in the newest Blackwell chips, and now there will be excellent demand for the older stuff. Mid-range customers may want to have their own supercomputers based on fewer expensive chips to solve more common problems at high quality rather than exclusive ones like it happens with supercomputers right now. A broader learning base will be available to them, adding popularity to chip producers. If I was in NVidia's place, I would be only but happy, as competitive threats for NVidia from Chinese-rooted and other chip producers seem to remain very distant in time.

Furthermore, even if the performance is roughly the same, AI models based on cutting-edge chips will likely be able to leverage more of the text and visual volumes to seek and finally generate their answer, so that cool and more expensive chips would probably continue to produce more digestible or better quality texts, pictures and videos at the output. There will be less hallucinating effects by chat bots. There will likely be fewer erroneous or unacceptable judgments based on the processing of a larger array of human-created information. If mega corporations adopt DeepSeek's simplification of program code or hardware methods, but using much more resources, they will soon create AI generators that are much closer to ideal, which will be more appreciated by consumers. If some produce quality texts in terms of the accuracy and responsibility of their answers, while others periodically slip into childish babble, then the choice is obvious. We will see what will happen. In a simple problem like "Alice has N brothers and X sisters, so can you tell me how many sisters does any brother of Alice have?" cheap models may be very good, but in more complex tasks, I think they will be inferior even to o1 by OpenAI, not to mention something that has not been created yet. The difficulties of time necessary for scaling successive models properly should also be considered. Already on Monday afternoon, DeepSeek could not withstand new registrations of free users on the network.

It's like comfort or business class taxis. Many people use a comfort class, although there is a cheaper economy class. BMW or Audi seem to be better cars than Renault or most Chinese brands, IMHO, but not everyone prefers Renault, and rather takes out a loan to buy a more expensive car. Although there are low-cost airlines, most people continue to fly regular airlines that offer more services, and extra-class airlines like Emirates or Turkish Airlines also have a lot of customers. In the case of high-quality chat bots, we are talking about a much more budget-friendly service, so that many will choose quality if the difference is noticeable, don't you think so? Because AMD makes cheaper but less useful chips, NVidia has not lost its market share so far, but on the contrary, has increased its expansion. In the same way, there will simply be budget AI products at low prices to promote the services of any small company or just to have fun, and premium products at a slightly higher price for those who strive for more.

What I also like as an NVidia investor is a cool hospitality and willingness to welcome the Chinese project that was clear in the initial reaction of NVidia people. There was not a condescending tone. "DeepSeek is an excellent AI advancement and a perfect example of Test Time Scaling," a NVidia spokesperson told on January 27. "DeepSeek’s work illustrates how new models can be created using that technique, leveraging widely-available models and compute that is fully export control compliant. Inference requires significant numbers of NVidia GPUs and high-performance networking. We now have three scaling laws: pre-training and post-training, which continue, and new test-time scaling”. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman spoke out on DeepSeek’s model, calling it "impressive", "particularly around what they're able to deliver for the price", but OpenAI is planning to deliver better models as "more important now than ever before to succeed at our mission". His firm continues to follow its "research roadmap", while demand for AI is "likely to remain strong", he added in a post on X. It looks more like genuine cheerfulness than putting on a good face when things are going badly. Big players can do more with existing computing power than we previously thought before DeepSeek case, is my conclusion, while smaller players will buy chips to try their best as well.

As for a further market dynamics of NVidia and other "lost" AI shares, the inertia of the fall and some medium-term profits taking out of harm's way, as I suppose, may be able to drag the price of NVidia to the $90+ area, where it already came once under an unfavourable combination of general market factors in early August 2024. But it may not be obliged to reach double-digit figures for the price per share, that's only a possibility, which is negative for shareholders but positive for potential buyers. On January 28, on the pre-market trading, NVidia shares have already added more than 5% to the previous day closing price, given that the prices nearly hit $125, which I consider to be the bottom of the current technical resistance zone, extending from $124 to $128 per share (see the chart). If they ever go further upstairs, which is unlikely to happen right away, then markets will make NVidia rise higher again. This is my basic scenario for now. In the meantime, the uncertainty and the need for investors to think carefully about new information will put some pressure on. And it may even offset the effect of quarterly corporate reports from major techs like Microsoft, Meta and Tesla, which are expected on the night from Wednesday, January 29, to Thursday, January 30.

I can only add here that OpenAI's market value could have fallen, but OpenAI is fortunately not a public company. Other interested parties, like Meta, for example, wisely and timely reduced their expenses on their own chat bots developments, choosing for now to use third-party products to make more complicated services, only winning if the costs for semi-finished products turn out to be less than expected. Likewise, companies that haven't built many of their own data centers and other chip infrastructure but have used the work of others in this field to make their AI features better, like Adobe in programming design or Walmart in smart shopping suggestions and customer preferences' analysis, can win even more.

3924
Rafael Quintana Martinez
Money Manager de alto rendimiento, con una sólida formación académica, profesional y de campo. Más de 9 años de experiencia especializada en el comercio de mercados financieros internacionales. La devoción, la fiabilidad, la responsabilidad y la ética impulsan mi vida. Actualmente me desempeño como Analista Senior para Metadoro. https://metadoro.com/es https://mx.investing.com/members/contributors/235587671/ https://es.tradingview.com/chart/EURUSD/rE9gVips/
Maker Is Seen Down to $1000

Maker (MKR) is down 3.2% this week to $1,180, recovering from a low of $1,114 on Monday—its weakest level since 5 November, when the altcoin initiated a 116% rally following Donald Trump’s election victory. The recent decline has been partly driven by Trump's announcement of tariffs on Colombia and plans to introduce additional tariffs on chips, pharmaceuticals, and metals imported into the United States.

Another key factor weighing on MKR is the emergence of DeepSeek AI, which reportedly runs on cheaper chips. This has undermined the valuations of major chip manufacturers like Nvidia and prominent AI developers, leading to a 5.2% drop in the Nasdaq 100 on Monday. The stock market's downturn has exerted additional pressure on the broader crypto market, including Maker.

Although a further significant decline in the stock market seems unlikely, Maker’s price remains vulnerable and could fall to $1,000. Even if market conditions stabilise, MKR is unlikely to reverse its current downward trend in the short term.

3695
89

Únete a nuestra comunidad

Comparta sus observaciones profesionales y aficionadas, intercambie experiencias, anticipe desarrollos

Categoría
Todo
Stocks
Crypto
Etf
Commodities
Indices
Currencies
Energies
Metals
Instrumentos
Autor
Todo
Metadoro
Colaboradores